Tragedy masks

Ruvercap: Never Again

From Charles Ponzi to Bernie Madoff, financial con men all have one thing in common: obscurity. They operate in the dark.

Investors now have a technology that can help protect them from being conned: it is called the blockchain. Not tech-savvy? Well, it is just a traditional record-book for the information age. With three improvements.

  • It is transparent
  • It cannot be changed
  • It is available in real-time

This blockchain record-book brings light to the old world of financial obscurity, for the benefit of investors.

The Ruvercap disaster

As the War on Savers continued, two businessmen in Zurich set up a private debt fund called Ruvercap to offer a 2-3% return to investors. In a low yield environment they had a lot of takers. PIMCO put in money.

At one time, Ruvercap oversaw about CHF 700 million.

The transparent structure that they put in place is set out below, in comparison to a blockchain record-book structure:

It is actually more complex than this; I have simplified it.
It is actually more complex than this; I have simplified it.

One of their loans was to a Swiss firm, which lent to a South African firm secured against receivables from a company in Zimbabwe. Seems reasonable for a fund that operates in euros, dollars and francs. Unfortunately, there was a problem with the currency in Zimbabwe and the loan didn’t get paid back.

Another loan was in relation to the purchase of a Serbian battery manufacturer. KPMG, called in to try to understand the situation, cannot even determine how the funding was structured, but most of the money appears to be lost. The company was subsequently sold to Cyprus-based entity; the details are murky. Again, seems a reasonable risk to take for a 2-3% return.

To make a long story short, the current asset value of the funds cannot be established. Investors suspect that up to CHF 500 million is missing. KPMG has said that Ruvercap has not helped with the audit and failed to turn over documents. Lawsuits have been filed in several countries. PIMCO is no longer dealing with Ruvercap.

Ruvercap is an embarrassment to Switzerland and to the sophisticated investors involved. Fortunately, there is a solution so it never happens again.

Two information architectures

The biggest aspect of due diligence for any investment is information. Information is trust. The only healthy relationship that can exist between two parties must be based on a transparent information exchange.

In the financial world, this comes down to your architecture: either it is open (a blockchain record-book) or closed (a traditional in-house database). There are broadly two technology architectures for managing information, set out below.

RUVERCAP: NEVER AGAIN

THE BLOCKCHAIN RECORD BOOK SOLUTION

Ruvercap would never have happened with a blockchain record-book in place. Same for Bernie Madoff. Same for Charles Ponzi. Here is why:

  • The location of the money is recorded at all times
  • Investors would have seen the use of funds in real-time and could have put an end to it
  • The numbers are transparently recorded; you cannot cheat and take money from one account to another
  • The funds are legally in your name, not the name of the finance company

Perhaps the biggest advantage of a transparent record-book like blockchain is that it encourages managers to be honest. People act differently if they know that others are watching.

Of course, it is not a perfect solution. Losses happen and some people behave inappropriately; that is life. But, it is vastly better than not knowing what is going on.

Future generations will look at us and ask: did you really just blindly trust people with your money? With no way to know what they were doing with your funds?

Swiss institutional investors should take the lead in insisting on the protections offered by a blockchain record-book. Blockchain technology is almost as Swiss as cheese and chocolate: ETH in Zurich and EPFL in Lausanne train some of the world’s best computer scientists in this field; FINMA is one of the most supportive regulators globally; Swisscom is implementing a blockchain-based signature system; and cantons like Geneva are putting their entire corporate registry on a blockchain.

In the future, smart investors will ask: am I putting my money into a black box or into a blockchain?
Robert Sharratt

Robert Sharratt

A former banker who has had enough of disparities in financial opportunities. Working to leave the world a better place than he found it, writing while doing it.